- Home
- English
- BUCHAREST, (26.02.2019, 17:55)
- Ionut Preda
Online news - Breaking news and last minute updates - Last update: 10:10, 23 decembrie 2024
mediafax
- Home
- Video
- Politics
- Economic
- Social
- Sports
- International
- Science
- Culture
- Life
- One book a day
- Weather
- Talks
- English
More Courts and Prosecutor’s Offices Join Protests Against Judicial Decree
One court and multiple prosecutor’s offices announced on Tuesday that they will join a growing list of judicial institutions suspending their non-urgent activity, in protest against a recent Government judicial decree which magistrate associations say will negatively impact the justice system.
7 viewsMore Courts and Prosecutor’s Offices Join Protests Against Judicial Decree
The Court of Targoviste announced that it will suspend its activity until March 1, with all cases due to be judged this week postponed, with the exception of emergencies.
Prosecutors from the Constanta Court will also join in the protest, with their activity to be suspended each day between 8 and 12 until the end of the week.
Several prosecutor’s offices in Harghita county also announced that they will suspend their non-urgent activity for the week and called for a protest in Bucharest on Wednesday.
They join several judicial institutions throughout the country which have suspended their activity in protest against the decree, including top anti-terrorism agency DIICOT.
The protests have continued despite the fact that Romanian Justice Minister Tudorel Toader announced on Monday that he agreed to repeal some of the decree’s most controversial provisions, but also rejected the idea of a full repeal.
The bill contains several changes to the contest for admission into the National Institute of Magistracy (INM) and the attributions of the Supreme Court’s Section for Investigating Judicial Offences (SIIJ) chief-prosecutor, and blocks delegations into chief prosecutor roles.
Before the partial repeal announced by Toader, the act also extended the eligibility criteria for top prosecutor offices to judges who have previously worked as prosecutors, instead of only prosecutors who are active at the time of the nomination.
Additionally, it amended the procedure for appointing top prosecutors, as candidacies for such offices were set to be reviewed by the plenary of the country’s top judicial watchdog, the Superior Council of the Magistracy (CSM), instead of the institution’s Prosecutors’ Section, as is currently the case.
The act was criticized by Romania’s main prosecutors’ offices, but also by top judicial watchdog CSM’s Prosecutors’ Section and by National Union of Romanian Judges. The institutions accused that its provisions might block the agencies’ activities and infringes on the principle of separating the careers of judges and prosecutors.
If you liked this story, please follow MEDIAFAX.RO on FACEBOOK »
The content of mediafax.ro is for your information only. Republishing or using this content is forbidden without express consent of MEDIAFAX. For this consent, please ask for it by mail at vanzari@mediafax.ro.